BLCO vs STAA

Bausch + Lomb Corporation vs STAAR Surgical Company — Valuation Comparison 2026

BLCO

Ophthalmic Goods
Bausch + Lomb Corporation
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$15.65
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

STAA

Ophthalmic Goods
STAAR Surgical Company
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$29.89
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BLCO Fair ValueBLCO Upside STAA Fair ValueSTAA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.03 -74.7% $3.33 -88.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.35 -80.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $2.75 -82.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BLCO vs STAA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BLCO vs STAA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STAA scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs BLCO's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Bausch + Lomb Corporation (BLCO) and STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BLCO currently trades at $15.65 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while STAA trades at $29.89 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).