BIRK vs WWW

Birkenstock Holding plc vs Wolverine World Wide, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BIRK

Footwear, (No Rubber)
Birkenstock Holding plc
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$45.07
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WWW

Footwear, (No Rubber)
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$17.55
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BIRK Fair ValueBIRK Upside WWW Fair ValueWWW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $34.98 -22.4% $18.37 +4.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.59 -49.9% $2.10 -88.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BIRK vs WWW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BIRK vs WWW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BIRK scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs WWW's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) and Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BIRK currently trades at $45.07 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while WWW trades at $17.55 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).