BGMS vs BHC

Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. vs Bausch Health Companies Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BGMS

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
52
WARN
Price
$1.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

BHC

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Bausch Health Companies Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$5.36
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BGMS Fair ValueBGMS Upside BHC Fair ValueBHC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.43 -60.5% $10.37 +82.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.98 +0.1% $1.11 -80.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BGMS vs BHC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BGMS vs BHC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BHC scores higher with a 5.8/10 quality rating vs BGMS's 5.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) and Bausch Health Companies Inc. (BHC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BGMS currently trades at $1.10 with a QOC of 5.1/10, while BHC trades at $5.36 with a QOC of 5.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).