BGM vs CGC

BGM Group Ltd. vs Canopy Growth Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

BGM

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
BGM Group Ltd.
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.32
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CGC

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Canopy Growth Corporation
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.12
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BGM Fair ValueBGM Upside CGC Fair ValueCGC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.06 -80.1% $0.46 -58.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.02 -92.1% $0.20 -81.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BGM vs CGC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BGM vs CGC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CGC scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs BGM's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BGM Group Ltd. (BGM) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BGM currently trades at $0.32 with a QOC of 2.2/10, while CGC trades at $1.12 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).