BELFB vs CLS

Bel Fuse Inc. vs Celestica, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BELFB

Electronic Components
Bel Fuse Inc.
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$276.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CLS

Electronic Components
Celestica, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$351.02
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BELFB Fair ValueBELFB Upside CLS Fair ValueCLS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.66 -92.9% $44.50 -87.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $20.66 -92.5% $72.53 -79.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BELFB vs CLS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BELFB vs CLS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CLS scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs BELFB's 9.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) and Celestica, Inc. (CLS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BELFB currently trades at $276.96 with a QOC of 9.9/10, while CLS trades at $351.02 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).