BEAM vs CADL

Beam Therapeutics Inc. vs Candel Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BEAM

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$32.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CADL

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Candel Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$8.30
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BEAM Fair ValueBEAM Upside CADL Fair ValueCADL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.58 -74.0% $3.24 -60.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.21 -43.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $10.26 -68.8% $2.44 -70.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BEAM vs CADL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BEAM vs CADL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BEAM scores higher with a 6.4/10 quality rating vs CADL's 4.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) and Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BEAM currently trades at $32.93 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while CADL trades at $8.30 with a QOC of 4.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).