BBCP vs DY

Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. vs Dycom Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BBCP

Engineering & Construction
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$7.91
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

DY

Engineering & Construction
Dycom Industries, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$535.20
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BBCP Fair ValueBBCP Upside DY Fair ValueDY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.82 -76.0% $33.53 -93.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.37 -95.1% $16.38 -96.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BBCP vs DY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BBCP vs DY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DY scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs BBCP's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BBCP currently trades at $7.91 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while DY trades at $535.20 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).