BAP vs BCAL

Credicorp Ltd. vs California BanCorp — Valuation Comparison 2026

BAP

Banks - Regional
Credicorp Ltd.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$341.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BCAL

Banks - Regional
California BanCorp
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$18.94
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BAP Fair ValueBAP Upside BCAL Fair ValueBCAL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $113.85 -66.7% $20.05 +5.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $121.18 -62.6% $29.01 +53.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BAP vs BCAL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BAP vs BCAL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BCAL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs BAP's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and California BanCorp (BCAL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BAP currently trades at $341.50 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while BCAL trades at $18.94 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).