BAP vs BBAR

Credicorp Ltd. vs Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BAP

Banks - Regional
Credicorp Ltd.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$341.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BBAR

Banks - Regional
Banco BBVA Argentina S.A.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$17.62
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BAP Fair ValueBAP Upside BBAR Fair ValueBBAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $113.85 -66.7% $35.16 +99.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $121.18 -62.6% $23.90 +35.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BAP vs BBAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BAP vs BBAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BBAR scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs BAP's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. (BBAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BAP currently trades at $341.50 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while BBAR trades at $17.62 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).