AXGN vs BLFS

AxoGen, Inc. vs BioLife Solutions, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AXGN

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
AxoGen, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$39.48
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

BLFS

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
BioLife Solutions, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
19
SAFE
Price
$24.92
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AXGN Fair ValueAXGN Upside BLFS Fair ValueBLFS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.73 -98.2% $2.87 -88.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.59 -80.2% $3.00 -85.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AXGN vs BLFS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AXGN vs BLFS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AXGN scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs BLFS's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN) and BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AXGN currently trades at $39.48 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while BLFS trades at $24.92 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).