AVO vs CHEF

Mission Produce, Inc. vs The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AVO

Food Distribution
Mission Produce, Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$11.25
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CHEF

Food Distribution
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$77.91
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AVO Fair ValueAVO Upside CHEF Fair ValueCHEF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.72 -75.8% $4.37 -94.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.14 -81.0% $3.45 -95.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AVO vs CHEF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AVO vs CHEF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CHEF scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs AVO's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AVO currently trades at $11.25 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while CHEF trades at $77.91 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).