ATLCP vs CACC

Atlanticus Holdings Corporation vs Credit Acceptance Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

ATLCP

Personal Credit Institutions
Atlanticus Holdings Corporation
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$24.22
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

CACC

Personal Credit Institutions
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$573.64
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ATLCP Fair ValueATLCP Upside CACC Fair ValueCACC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1630.43 +184.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $83.75 +245.8% $345.94 -39.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $30.56 +26.2% $236.07 -58.8%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ATLCP vs CACC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ATLCP vs CACC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CACC scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs ATLCP's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLCP) and Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ATLCP currently trades at $24.22 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while CACC trades at $573.64 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).