ATEN vs BOSC

A10 Networks, Inc. vs B.O.S. Better Online Solutions — Valuation Comparison 2026

ATEN

Computer Communications Equipment
A10 Networks, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$30.14
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

BOSC

Computer Communications Equipment
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
Quality
2.6
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$4.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ATEN Fair ValueATEN Upside BOSC Fair ValueBOSC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.22 -79.4% $0.90 -78.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.44 -88.6% $1.56 -65.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ATEN vs BOSC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ATEN vs BOSC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ATEN scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs BOSC's 2.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (BOSC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ATEN currently trades at $30.14 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while BOSC trades at $4.11 with a QOC of 2.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).