ARCT vs ARWR

Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings vs Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ARCT

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$7.92
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

ARWR

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$77.91
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ARCT Fair ValueARCT Upside ARWR Fair ValueARWR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.10 -35.6% $11.17 -85.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.36 -85.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $1.95 -72.2% $10.74 -85.2%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ARCT vs ARWR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ARCT vs ARWR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ARWR scores higher with a 7.4/10 quality rating vs ARCT's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings (ARCT) and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ARCT currently trades at $7.92 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while ARWR trades at $77.91 with a QOC of 7.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).