APOS vs BAM

Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Brookfield Asset Management Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

APOS

Investment Advice
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$26.07
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

BAM

Investment Advice
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$48.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType APOS Fair ValueAPOS Upside BAM Fair ValueBAM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.03 -81.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $64.27 +146.5% $11.07 -77.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $20.90 -19.8% $184.33 +279.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for APOS vs BAM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

APOS vs BAM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

APOS scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs BAM's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APOS) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc (BAM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

APOS currently trades at $26.07 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while BAM trades at $48.60 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).