Quick Summary — APH scores higher on quality with 10.0/10 vs CTS's 9.5/10. APH trades at $148.40 while CTS trades at $66.72. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
APH scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs CTS's 9.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $148.40, APH trades +73.3% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $39.61, while CTS at $66.72 trades +34.2% above its estimate of $43.90. APH shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
APH earns a Quality of Company score of 10.0/10 compared to CTS's 9.5/10. The scores are closely matched, indicating similar fundamental quality profiles. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
APH carries a SAFE value trap risk (12/100) while CTS shows SAFE risk (23/100). Both companies show manageable value trap risk, suggesting their current valuations are not artificially depressed by fundamental deterioration.
Both APH and CTS operate in Electronic Components, which has 46 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare APH vs CTS differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.