ANTA vs CACC

Antalpha Platform Holding Compa vs Credit Acceptance Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

ANTA

Credit Services
Antalpha Platform Holding Compa
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CACC

Credit Services
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$560.41
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ANTA Fair ValueANTA Upside CACC Fair ValueCACC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.13 -73.7% $1705.33 +204.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $345.94 -38.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $9.62 +5.5% $1939.22 +246.0%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ANTA vs CACC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ANTA vs CACC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CACC scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs ANTA's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Antalpha Platform Holding Compa (ANTA) and Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ANTA currently trades at $8.10 with a QOC of 2.4/10, while CACC trades at $560.41 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).