AMWD vs BSET

American Woodmark Corporation vs Bassett Furniture Industries, I — Valuation Comparison 2026

AMWD

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
American Woodmark Corporation
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$48.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

BSET

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Bassett Furniture Industries, I
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$14.83
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AMWD Fair ValueAMWD Upside BSET Fair ValueBSET Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $38.12 -20.7% $2.09 -85.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.76 -88.0% $1.67 -88.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AMWD vs BSET — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AMWD vs BSET — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BSET scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs AMWD's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) and Bassett Furniture Industries, I (BSET) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AMWD currently trades at $48.09 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while BSET trades at $14.83 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).