AIRS vs AMS

AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. vs American Shared Hospital Servic — Valuation Comparison 2026

AIRS

Medical Care Facilities
AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$5.38
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

AMS

Medical Care Facilities
American Shared Hospital Servic
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$1.46
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AIRS Fair ValueAIRS Upside AMS Fair ValueAMS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.37 -93.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.17 -94.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $1.64 -69.6% $1.45 +7.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.35 -79.2%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AIRS vs AMS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AIRS vs AMS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AIRS scores higher with a 5.9/10 quality rating vs AMS's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) and American Shared Hospital Servic (AMS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AIRS currently trades at $5.38 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while AMS trades at $1.46 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).