AIRS vs AMN

AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. vs AMN Healthcare Services Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

AIRS

Medical Care Facilities
AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$5.38
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

AMN

Medical Care Facilities
AMN Healthcare Services Inc
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$28.97
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AIRS Fair ValueAIRS Upside AMN Fair ValueAMN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.37 -93.2% $127.25 +339.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.17 -94.9% $31.49 +8.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AIRS vs AMN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AIRS vs AMN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AMN scores higher with a 6.7/10 quality rating vs AIRS's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) and AMN Healthcare Services Inc (AMN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AIRS currently trades at $5.38 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while AMN trades at $28.97 with a QOC of 6.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).