ADUS vs AIRS

Addus HomeCare Corporation vs AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ADUS

Medical Care Facilities
Addus HomeCare Corporation
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$91.68
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

AIRS

Medical Care Facilities
AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$5.38
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ADUS Fair ValueADUS Upside AIRS Fair ValueAIRS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $71.50 -22.0% $0.37 -93.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $37.61 -59.0% $0.17 -94.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ADUS vs AIRS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ADUS vs AIRS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ADUS scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs AIRS's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) and AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ADUS currently trades at $91.68 with a QOC of 9.4/10, while AIRS trades at $5.38 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).