ACCS vs CDLX

ACCESS Newswire Inc. vs Cardlytics, Inc. Common Stock — Valuation Comparison 2026

ACCS

Advertising Agencies
ACCESS Newswire Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$6.32
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CDLX

Advertising Agencies
Cardlytics, Inc. Common Stock
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
33
LOW
Price
$0.71
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ACCS Fair ValueACCS Upside CDLX Fair ValueCDLX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.21 -17.6% $0.81 +33.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.71 +41.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $8.36 +32.2% $2.69 +277.3%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ACCS vs CDLX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ACCS vs CDLX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ACCS scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs CDLX's 4.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) and Cardlytics, Inc. Common Stock (CDLX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ACCS currently trades at $6.32 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while CDLX trades at $0.71 with a QOC of 4.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).