AAMI vs AB

Acadian Asset Management Inc. vs AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AAMI

Asset Management
Acadian Asset Management Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$72.71
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

AB

Asset Management
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$36.99
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AAMI Fair ValueAAMI Upside AB Fair ValueAB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.93 -94.6% $61.89 +67.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.44 -80.1% $22.48 -39.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AAMI vs AB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AAMI vs AB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AAMI scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs AB's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AAMI currently trades at $72.71 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while AB trades at $36.99 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).