A vs BIAF

Agilent Technologies, Inc. vs bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

A

Diagnostics & Research
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$135.38
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

BIAF

Diagnostics & Research
bioAffinity Technologies, Inc.
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
49
WARN
Price
$1.65
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType A Fair ValueA Upside BIAF Fair ValueBIAF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $72.69 -46.3% $0.71 -56.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $32.33 -76.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $96.77 -28.5% $0.18 -91.8%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for A vs BIAF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

A vs BIAF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

A scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs BIAF's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) and bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

A currently trades at $135.38 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while BIAF trades at $1.65 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).